An argument in favor of in vitro fertilization

A chimp-pig hybrid origin for humans? July 3, by John Hewitt, Phys.

An argument in favor of in vitro fertilization

Jul 7th, By Matt Yonke Category: Blog Posts The Catholic Church has stood, since its inception, firmly against the use of any artificial methods of contraception.

An argument in favor of in vitro fertilization

In fact, it is the only Christian institution that, as a whole, has held this teaching consistently for all of Christian history. It can be a difficult issue for pastors to dictate what ought and ought not happen in the bedroom affairs of their parishoners. Tim Challies has also weighed in with a two-part post on contraception here and here.

Contributor Archives

For those unfamiliar with the issue, the pill works by making the womb inhospitable to a pregnancy. If conception does take place, it becomes very difficult for the brand new baby to attach to the walls of the uterus and begin its gestation. In essence, the baby, only a few cells big, would starve to death.

There is no solid medical evidence that this does actually happen, but the manufacturers of the pill acknowledge it as a possibility in the instructions that come with the drugs.

But even if the chance is remote, Christians have no place putting the lives of their children in jeopardy and I applaud these Reformed pastors for taking a stand against it for that reason.

Thus, Wilson states that a newly married couple avoiding children so they can make more money are in a problematic situation, while the couple with seven kids who are using contraception to postpone a pregnancy for a short time are doing just fine.

This seems to be a pretty common line in Reformed Christianity. The pill is perhaps to be avoided, but contraception in and of itself is not morally wrong, largely because Scripture does not say it is. If contraception other than the pill is considered wrong by modern Reformed theologians, it is not because of the nature of the act itself, but rather the motivations behind it.

What Does the Scripture Say? Scripture is, of course, notoriously silent on contraception, at least in explicit terms. The go-to passage is the sin of Onan in Genesis 38—the only passage that explicitly mentions contraception.

But I, along with many scholars on both sides of the Tiber, find this passage insufficient for building a case against contraception by itself.

Debate Argument: In Vitro Fertilization | rutadeltambor.com

But instead of doing that, Onan practiced coitus interruptus and spilled his seed on the ground, thus affording him sexual pleasure and releasing him from the obligation to take care of any children the union might produce.

For this, Onan was struck dead by the Lord.

An argument in favor of in vitro fertilization

This does seem to be the case and for that reason I think the passage is not capable, on its own, of providing Christians with an air-tight ban on contraception.

But, fortunately, the passage is not on its own. But more about Onan in a moment.

Contraception and the Reformed Faith

What Did the Reformers Say? It should be noted that the Reformers stood united with the rest of the Christian tradition in opposing all forms of contraception.In Vitro Fertilization 4 The arguments in favor for IVF have remained fairly consistent over the years.

An important argument for IVF was that by studying fertilization and early embryonic development outside the womb, scientist might learn more about how to prevent certain birth defects. Proponents also noted the possibility that knowledge . Is it “Healthcare” or Disease Care?.

True “healthcare” would be the care of the very basic unit of life, which as we know is the human cell. This comprehensive care would begin in our very early years, conceivably from conception, involving a system focused on the healthy maintenance of the cells and thus, the non-interference of cellular function, and subsequently unaltered DNA.

This archive is based upon Kristen's collection of erotic stories. All things within this archive are free and must have something to do with the world of erotica.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis - Wikipedia Allegedly the last words of Pliny the Elder before he left the docks at Pompeii to rescue people from the eruption of Vesuvius in Often quoted as audaces fortuna iuvat.
The Program Arguments for and against in vitro fertilisation Advantages Couples should have a right to try for children. Human beings are made with the ability to reproduce.
Related Stories Types of Cloning a.
What Do Today’s Reformed Pastors Say? April 06, I understand this to be the case when embryos are made and destroyed.
Recent Posts InVitro Fertilization has given homosexual couples a chance to have their own children. Since they are unable to reproduce as a couple, many choose InVitro so that they are able to go through the same process of having children, just with some help from science.

The advantages and disadvantages of cloning humans as well as the ethical and social problems involved in it! - Sabine Reinhold - Pre-University Paper - English - Miscellaneous - Publish your bachelor's or master's thesis, dissertation, term paper or essay.

By using In Vitro Fertilization in animals, there is the potential to rescue the gene pool of endangered animals and animals that cannot reproduce, or at least don't reproduce at a quick enough pace to maintain the species. Oct 08,  · When biologist Robert Edwards, who perfected in vitro fertilization (IVF) more than 30 years ago, was awarded the Nobel Prize on Oct.

4, public reaction was swift and divided. (More on rutadeltambor.com: 5 Pregnancy Taboos Explained (or Debunked)) Potts finds this argument frustrating.

Engineering the Perfect Baby - MIT Technology Review